
GeForce GTX 285
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 285
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌44.2% HIGHER MSRP$359 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅423.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1062.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 285
2008GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅423.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1062.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌44.2% HIGHER MSRP$359 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX 285?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 285 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 285 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 285
GeForce GTX 285
The GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 23 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 648 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $359.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 285 scores 1,475 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 706.2%. The GeForce GTX 285 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 55 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 285) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 0.7085 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 285) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475 | 11,892+706% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 2560+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7085 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+1168% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 285 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 285 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 285) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 285) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | — | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 285 draws 204W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 44.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 285) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 204W | 130W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 450W-18% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 7.2 | 91.5+1171% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 285 launched at $359 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 30.6% less ($110 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (GeForce GTX 285) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1065.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $359 | $249-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1 | 47.8+1066% |
| Codename | GT200B | GA106 |
| Release | December 23 2008 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #771 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













