G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 295

2009

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
25.1% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅886.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2264.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅357.1% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 886.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1790.7% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 1,198), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 295 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 55nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2264.6% (56.8 vs 2.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1790.7%. The GeForce GTX 295 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	1,198	22,651+1791%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	55 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	480 ×2	4352+807%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5962 TFLOPS ×2	22.06 TFLOPS+3600%
ROPs	28 ×2	48+71%
TMUs	80 ×2	136+70%
L2 Cache	0.22 MB	32 MB+14445%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 295 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 295 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 295 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 357.1% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 295 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.22 MB (GeForce GTX 295) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	1.75 GB	8 GB+357%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	288 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.22 MB	32 MB+14445%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 295) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12.2+10%
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP2	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP2	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 57.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP	289W	160W-45%
Recommended PSU	680W	550W-19%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	8-pin
Length	267mm	240mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	95°C	70°C-26%
Perf/Watt	4.1	141.6+3354%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 295 came in at $499, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 20% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 2266.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP	$499	$399-20%
Performance per Dollar	2.4	56.8+2267%
Codename	GT200B	AD106
Release	January 8 2009	May 18 2023
Ranking	#816	#59

Search GeForce GTX 295 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.