GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M

2011Core: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U

2025Core: 1452 MHzBoost: 2300 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 485M

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • 132.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 43W.

Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U

2025

Why buy it

  • 26.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 43W instead of 100W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 485M instead at 2,360 vs 2,301, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 40nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M

The GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,360 points.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U

The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,301 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 485M scores 2,360 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U reaches 2,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M is built on Fermi while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MRadeon Ryzen 7 4800U
G3D Mark Score
2,360+3%
2,301
Architecture
Fermi
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
384
1792+367%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8832 TFLOPS
16.49 TFLOPS+1767%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
64
112+75%
L1 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 485M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MRadeon Ryzen 7 4800U
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 485M and System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MRadeon Ryzen 7 4800U
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 485M draws 100W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U's 43W — a 79.7% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MRadeon Ryzen 7 4800U
TDP
100W
43W-57%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
23.6
53.5+127%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U (2025 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MRadeon Ryzen 7 4800U
MSRP
$450
Codename
GF104
Navi 33
Release
January 5 2011
August 8 2025
Ranking
#645
#229

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.