G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 SE vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 SE vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 SE

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 210mm instead of 304mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅919.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 265% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
❌44.8% longer card at 304mm vs 210mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 919.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1357.4% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 1,847), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 560 SE is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $449 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 265% (44.9 vs 12.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 560 SE vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 SE

The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 560 SE scores 1,847 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 1357.4%. The GeForce GTX 560 SE is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 SE	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	1,847	26,919+1357%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	40 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	288	5888+1944%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8479 TFLOPS	29.15 TFLOPS+3338%
ROPs	24	64+167%
TMUs	48	184+283%
L1 Cache	0.38 MB	5.8 MB+1426%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	36 MB+9374%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 560 SE does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 560 SE is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 SE	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 SE has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 SE and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 SE	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	12 GB+1100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	504 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	36 MB+9374%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 SE	GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX	12_0	12.2+2%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 SE	GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	—	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 SE draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 210mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 SE	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	150W-25%	200W
Recommended PSU	500W-23%	650W
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	210mm	304mm
Height	—	137mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	12.3	134.6+994%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 SE came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 SE was 75% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 265% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 SE	GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP	$150-75%	$599
Performance per Dollar	12.3	44.9+265%
Codename	GF114	AD104
Release	February 20 2012	April 12 2023
Ranking	#706	#32

Search GeForce GTX 560 SE on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.