
GeForce GTX 580 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

GeForce GTX 580
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 580 is significantly newer (2010 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 580 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 580 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 580 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | Fermi (2010−2014) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 460 768MB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 580 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB

GeForce GTX 580
The GeForce GTX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 9 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 772 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 244W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,634 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB
The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 580 scores 4,634 and the GeForce GTX 460 768MB reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 580 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB uses Fermi. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 580) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,634 | 4,800+4% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Shading Units | 512+52% | 336 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 580 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 580 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 580) vs 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) — a 122.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 580. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+122% | 86.4 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 580) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 580) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 580) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 580 draws 244W versus the GeForce GTX 460 768MB's 75W — a 106% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 580) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 210mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 244W | 75W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 450W-18% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 210mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 19.0 | 64.0+237% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















