GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs GeForce GTX 1060 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs GeForce GTX 1060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs GeForce GTX 1060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $80 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Draws 134W instead of 180W, a 46W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 277.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 34.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 134W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 277.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 194.7% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 3,415), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $80 more expensive on MSRP at $249 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 100% (40.4 vs 20.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs GeForce GTX 1060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 194.7%. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTGeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
3,415
10,064+195%
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
768
2560+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.585 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+460%
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1733 MHz+68%
ROPs
24
64+167%
TMUs
64
160+150%
L1 Cache
64 KB
960 KB+1400%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTGeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTGeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
6 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
192 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTGeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
12 (FL 11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.4
4.5+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTGeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
PureVideo VP5
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 29.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTGeForce GTX 1060
TDP
134W-26%
180W
Recommended PSU
450W
400W-11%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
6-pin
Length
241mm
173mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
97°C
Perf/Watt
25.5
55.9+119%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST came in at $169, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST was 32.1% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTGeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$169-32%
$249
Performance per Dollar
20.2
40.4+100%
Codename
GK106
GP104
Release
March 26 2013
May 27 2016
Ranking
#551
#137

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.