GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon RX 560X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560X

2018Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon RX 560X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon RX 560X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon RX 560X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 560X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 31% HIGHER MSRP
    $169 MSRPvs$129 MSRP

Radeon RX 560X

2018

Why buy it

  • 41.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $40 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Delivers 28.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.9 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 560X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST instead at 3,415 vs 3,340, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 560X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 560X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 28.1% (25.9 vs 20.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon RX 560X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

AMD

Radeon RX 560X

The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 and the Radeon RX 560X reaches 3,340 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X). Raw compute: 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon RX 560X
G3D Mark Score
3,415+2%
3,340
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768
1024+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.585 TFLOPS
2.611 TFLOPS+65%
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1275 MHz+23%
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
64
64
L1 Cache
64 KB
256 KB+300%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 560X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon RX 560X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 560X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560X. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X) — the Radeon RX 560X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon RX 560X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the Radeon RX 560X's 75W — a 56.5% difference. The Radeon RX 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 400W (Radeon RX 560X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon RX 560X
TDP
134W
75W-44%
Recommended PSU
450W
400W-11%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
97°C
Perf/Watt
25.5
44.5+75%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST came in at $169, while the Radeon RX 560X launched at $129. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560X was 23.7% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 25.9 (Radeon RX 560X) — the Radeon RX 560X offers 28.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560X (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon RX 560X
MSRP
$169
$129-24%
Performance per Dollar
20.2
25.9+28%
Codename
GK106
Polaris 21
Release
March 26 2013
April 11 2018
Ranking
#551
#556

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.