
GeForce GTX 660M

Tesla M2090
GeForce GTX 660M vs Tesla M2090 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 660M vs Tesla M2090 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 660M vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 660M
2012Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Tesla M2090
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 660M vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 660M
The GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 835 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points.

Tesla M2090
The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 660M scores 1,452 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660M is built on Kepler while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,452+4% | 1,400 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7296 TFLOPS | 1.332 TFLOPS+83% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.03 MB | 1 MB+3233% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 660M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M2090 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 660M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2090 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 660M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 660M and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2090) — the Tesla M2090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL 11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 660M) vs CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | CUDA,OpenCL |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 660M draws 50W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-80% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 248mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.0+418% | 5.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 660M (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2500 |
| Codename | GK107 | GF110 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #774 | #530 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















