GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Radeon RX 590
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon RX 590 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon RX 590 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon RX 590: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 590 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150.5% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
Radeon RX 590
2018Why buy it
- ✅39.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $420 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 146.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.4 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon RX 590 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.
Radeon RX 590
The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 9,469 and the Radeon RX 590 reaches 9,315 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 590 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 590). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,469+2% | 9,315 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+25% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.345 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS+33% |
| Boost Clock | 928 MHz | 1545 MHz+66% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+67% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 576 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 590 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 780 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 590 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 590 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 590 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 590) — a 31.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Ti. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 590. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 590) — the Radeon RX 590 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 8 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+31% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 590). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 590's 175W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon RX 590 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 590). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 175W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 80°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 37.9 | 53.2+40% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Ti came in at $699, while the Radeon RX 590 launched at $279. On MSRP, Radeon RX 590 was 60.1% cheaper ($420 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 33.4 (Radeon RX 590) — the Radeon RX 590 offers 147.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 590 (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $279-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5 | 33.4+147% |
| Codename | GK110B | Polaris 30 |
| Release | November 7 2013 | November 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #278 | #285 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 780 Ti and Radeon RX 590
