GeForce GTX 780 vs Arc A530M
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:
Arc A530M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Arc A530M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A530M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Arc A530M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A530M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 780 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 780 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A530M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and Arc A530M
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.
Arc A530M
The Arc A530M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 1 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,013 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the Arc A530M reaches 8,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the Arc A530M uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 1,536 (Arc A530M). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 3.994 TFLOPS (Arc A530M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 8,013 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+50% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+4% | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1300 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+100% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 8 MB+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A530M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 780 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780) vs 224 GB/s (Arc A530M) — a 28.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 8 MB (Arc A530M) — the Arc A530M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+29% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 8 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12.2 (Arc A530M). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A530M). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A530M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the Arc A530M's 65W — a 117.5% difference. The Arc A530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 500W (Arc A530M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 65W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 123.3+288% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A530M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | — |
| Codename | GK110 | DG2-256 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | August 1 2023 |
| Ranking | #320 | #317 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 780 and Arc A530M
