
GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 770

GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 960 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 770.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 770 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 770 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $45), it costs 11% less, resulting in a 9.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+9.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and GeForce GTX 770

GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce GTX 770
The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the GeForce GTX 770 reaches 5,961 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 770 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1085 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133+3% | 5,961 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 3.333 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+9% | 1085 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 770) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce GTX 770. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 770) — the GeForce GTX 960 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 224 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX 770). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 770). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 770).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 770's 230W — a 78.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 770). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-57% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-33% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3+137% | 25.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the GeForce GTX 770 launched at $399 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTX 770 costs 11.1% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 136.3 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 149.0 (GeForce GTX 770) — the GeForce GTX 770 offers 9.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 960 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-50% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | $40-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 136.3 | 149.0+9% |
| Codename | GM206 | GK104 |
| Release | January 22 2015 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #393 | #398 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












