CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX TITAN Black.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-9.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+9.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $120), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 119.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+119.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Black and GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 9.7%. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,177 | 10,064+10% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+13% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.645 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+57% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1733 MHz+77% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+50% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 960 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+75% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 180W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 400W-33% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7 | 55.9+52% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 50% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 76.5 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 119.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $249-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $60-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.5 | 167.7+119% |
| Codename | GK110B | GP104 |
| Release | February 18 2014 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #288 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN Black and GeForce GTX 1060
