GeForce MX330 vs GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce MX330
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX330 is positioned at rank #293 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX330
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 623.2% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-623.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+623.2%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $289 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 150.2% better value per dollar than the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+150.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX330 and GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce MX330
The GeForce MX330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1531 MHz to 1594 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,350 points.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX330 scores 2,350 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 623.2%. The GeForce MX330 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX330) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 1.224 TFLOPS (GeForce MX330) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1594 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,350 | 16,995+623% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3584+833% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.224 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+941% |
| Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | 1777 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 112+367% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 3.5 MB+2400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX330 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 48 GB/s (GeForce MX330) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 650% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX330) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 360 GB/s+650% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce MX330) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Pascal (GeForce MX330) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce MX330) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Pascal | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX330 draws 10W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 177.8% difference. The GeForce MX330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX330) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-94% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 235.0+135% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX330 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 and now averages $289. The GeForce MX330 costs 65.4% less ($189 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.5 (GeForce MX330) vs 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 150.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-54% | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-65% | $289 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5 | 58.8+150% |
| Codename | GP108 | GA106 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #647 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX330 and GeForce RTX 3060
