GeForce MX330 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
GeForce MX330
Popular choices:
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX330 is positioned at rank #293 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX330
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | GeForce MX330 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX330 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $350 for the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H, it costs 71% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 245.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX330 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+245.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX330 and Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
GeForce MX330
The GeForce MX330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1531 MHz to 1594 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,350 points.
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,379 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX330 scores 2,350 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H reaches 2,379 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX330 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX330) vs 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H). Raw compute: 1.224 TFLOPS (GeForce MX330) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H). Boost clocks: 1594 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,350 | 2,379+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1408+267% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.224 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS+325% |
| Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | 1845 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX330 draws 10W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H's 110W — a 166.7% difference. The GeForce MX330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX330) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-91% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 235.0+988% | 21.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX330 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H launched at $350 and now averages $350. The GeForce MX330 costs 71.4% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.5 (GeForce MX330) vs 6.8 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H) — the GeForce MX330 offers 245.6% better value. The GeForce MX330 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-57% | $350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-71% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5+246% | 6.8 |
| Codename | GP108 | Navi 14 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #647 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX330 and Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
