
GeForce MX330 vs Radeon RX 550X

GeForce MX330
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 550X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX330 is positioned at rank #293 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX330
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 550X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | GeForce MX330 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 550X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $45 versus $100 for the GeForce MX330, it costs 55% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 125.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX330 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+125.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX330 and Radeon RX 550X

GeForce MX330
The GeForce MX330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1531 MHz to 1594 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,350 points.

Radeon RX 550X
The Radeon RX 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,381 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX330 scores 2,350 and the Radeon RX 550X reaches 2,381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX330 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 550X uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX330) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550X). Raw compute: 1.224 TFLOPS (GeForce MX330) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X). Boost clocks: 1594 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,350 | 2,381+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.224 TFLOPS+1% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1594 MHz+35% | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+13% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX330 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550X has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 550X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce MX330) vs 12 (Radeon RX 550X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Pascal (GeForce MX330) vs UVD (Radeon RX 550X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce MX330) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 550X).
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Pascal | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX330 draws 10W versus the Radeon RX 550X's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce MX330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX330) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550X). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-80% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 235.0+394% | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX330 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon RX 550X launched at $109 and now averages $45. The Radeon RX 550X costs 55% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.5 (GeForce MX330) vs 52.9 (Radeon RX 550X) — the Radeon RX 550X offers 125.1% better value. The GeForce MX330 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $109-27% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $45-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5 | 52.9+125% |
| Codename | GP108 | Lexa |
| Release | February 10 2020 | December 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #647 | #642 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















