GeForce MX330 vs GRID M10-1Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX330 vs GRID M10-1Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX330 vs GRID M10-1Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX330

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GRID M10-1Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX330 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 10W instead of 225W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2020 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GRID M10-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌2150% higher power demand at 225W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M10-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (2,385 vs 2,350), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX330 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX330 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GRID M10-1Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce MX330 vs GRID M10-1Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX330

The GeForce MX330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1531 MHz to 1594 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,350 points.

GRID M10-1Q

The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX330 scores 2,350 and the GRID M10-1Q reaches 2,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX330 is built on Pascal while the GRID M10-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX330) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q). Raw compute: 1.224 TFLOPS (GeForce MX330) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q). Boost clocks: 1594 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX330	GRID M10-1Q
G3D Mark Score	2,350	2,385+1%
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.224 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+294%
Boost Clock	1594 MHz+35%	1178 MHz
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	24	128+433%
L1 Cache	144 KB	768 KB+433%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX330 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M10-1Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX330	GRID M10-1Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX330 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-1Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX330) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1Q) — the GRID M10-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX330	GRID M10-1Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce MX330) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce MX330	GRID M10-1Q
DirectX	12	12_1
Max Displays	2	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX330 draws 10W versus the GRID M10-1Q's 225W — a 183% difference. The GeForce MX330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX330) vs 350W (GRID M10-1Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX330	GRID M10-1Q
TDP	10W-96%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	235.0+2117%	10.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX330 came in at $150, while the GRID M10-1Q launched at $0. On MSRP, GRID M10-1Q was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.7 (GeForce MX330) vs Infinity (GRID M10-1Q) — the GRID M10-1Q offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX330 (2020 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce MX330	GRID M10-1Q
MSRP	$150	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	15.7	Infinity
Codename	GP108	GM204
Release	February 10 2020	August 30 2015
Ranking	#647	#525

Search GeForce MX330 on Amazon

Search GRID M10-1Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.