GeForce MX330 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce MX330
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX330 is positioned at rank #293 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX330
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 764.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-764.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+764.3%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 208.7% better value per dollar than the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+208.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX330 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce MX330
The GeForce MX330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1531 MHz to 1594 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,350 points.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX330 scores 2,350 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 764.3%. The GeForce MX330 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX330) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 1.224 TFLOPS (GeForce MX330) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1594 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,350 | 20,312+764% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4864+1167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.224 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+1224% |
| Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | 1665 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 24 | 152+533% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 4.8 MB+3329% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX330 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 48 GB/s (GeForce MX330) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 833.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX330) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 448 GB/s+833% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce MX330) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Pascal (GeForce MX330) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce MX330) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Pascal | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX330 draws 10W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 181% difference. The GeForce MX330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX330) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-95% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 235.0+131% | 101.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX330 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The GeForce MX330 costs 64.3% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.5 (GeForce MX330) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 208.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce MX330 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-62% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-64% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5 | 72.5+209% |
| Codename | GP108 | GA104 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #647 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX330 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
