GeForce MX550 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX550 is positioned at rank #187 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX550

#177

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

363%

#179

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

329%

#180

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

329%

#184

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

299%

#185

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

297%

#187

GeForce MX550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#195

GeForce GT625M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

94%

#197

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 75.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX550.

Insight	GeForce MX550	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-75.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+75.6%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $150 for the GeForce MX550, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 251.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce MX550	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+251.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX550 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX550 and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce MX550

The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX550 scores 4,480 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 75.6%. The GeForce MX550 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce MX550) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce MX550) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1320 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX550	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	4,480	7,869+76%
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1024+14%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.703 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+10%
Boost Clock	1320 MHz	1665 MHz+26%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	2 MB+127%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce MX550	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX550 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce MX550) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 60% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX550) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce MX550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX550	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	80 GB/s	128 GB/s+60%
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX550 draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce MX550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX550) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.

Feature	GeForce MX550	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	25W-67%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Mobile	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	179.2+71%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX550 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 50% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.9 (GeForce MX550) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 250.8% better value. The GeForce MX550 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).