GeForce MX550 vs Arc Graphics 130V
GeForce MX550
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX550 is positioned at rank 187 and the Arc Graphics 130V is on rank 302, so the GeForce MX550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX550
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce MX550 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce MX550 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130V, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 65.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX550 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+65.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX550 and Arc Graphics 130V
GeForce MX550
The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX550 scores 4,480 and the Arc Graphics 130V reaches 4,510 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX550 is built on Turing while the Arc Graphics 130V uses Xe², both on 12 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce MX550) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130V). Boost clocks: 1320 MHz vs 1850 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,480 | 4,510 |
| Architecture | Turing | Xe² |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+14529% | 7 |
| Boost Clock | 1320 MHz | 1850 MHz+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX550 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB. The GeForce MX550 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX550 draws 25W versus the Arc Graphics 130V's 15W — a 50% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX550) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130V). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 15W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 179.2 | 300.7+68% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX550 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 and now averages $250. The GeForce MX550 costs 40% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.9 (GeForce MX550) vs 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) — the GeForce MX550 offers 66.1% better value. The Arc Graphics 130V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-50% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-40% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.9+66% | 18.0 |
| Codename | TU117S | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | December 17 2021 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #468 | #463 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX550 and Arc Graphics 130V
