
GeForce MX570 A vs GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX570 A is positioned at rank #239 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 112.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570 A.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-112.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+112.1%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU's 13,170 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU leads by 112.1%. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570 A) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) with 64 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 13,170+112% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3584+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+169% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1777 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 40 | 48+20% |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 3.5 MB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 28+75% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 112+75% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX570 A comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 336 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU's 170W — a 148.7% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-85% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+220% | 77.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















