
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:

T600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 40W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.7 vs 32.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
T600
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce MX570 A is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 40W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570 A
2022T600
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 40W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.7 vs 32.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce MX570 A is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 40W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is T600 better than GeForce MX570 A?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce MX570 A make more sense than T600?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 64 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and T600

GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

T600
T600
The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the T600 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,425+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+177% | 1.709 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1335 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1 MB (T600) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the T600's 40W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-38% | 40W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+55% | 160.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP, while the T600 launched at $200. The T600 costs 33.3% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 32.1 (T600) — the T600 offers 55.1% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $200-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7 | 32.1+55% |
| Codename | GA107 | TU117 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #387 | #378 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













