GeForce MX570 vs FirePro D300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX570 is positioned at rank 117 and the FirePro D300 is on rank 130, so the GeForce MX570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570

#107

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

284%

#109

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

257%

#110

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

257%

#114

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

233%

#115

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

232%

#117

GeForce MX570

MSRP: $150|Avg: $120

100%

#118

Radeon RX 6500

MSRP: $199|Avg: $150

100%

#119

GeForce 825M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#121

Radeon HD 6970M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $48

99%

#123

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#126

GeForce GT 550M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

98%

#131

GeForce GT 335M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro D300

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

95%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

90%

#115

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1291%

#130

FirePro D300

MSRP: $500|Avg: $20

100%

#131

Radeon Pro WX 3200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

97%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

96%

#134

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

94%

#135

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

93%

#136

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

93%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

87%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

87%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

86%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

86%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

86%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

84%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce MX570 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The GeForce MX570 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro D300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro D300.

Insight	GeForce MX570	FirePro D300
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity	Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro D300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $120 for the GeForce MX570, it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 498.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce MX570	FirePro D300
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+498.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX570 Benchmark Check

FirePro D300 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and FirePro D300

GeForce MX570

The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the FirePro D300 reaches 5,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the FirePro D300 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 1,280 (FirePro D300). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300).

Feature	GeForce MX570	FirePro D300
G3D Mark Score	5,738	5,722
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+60%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+117%	2.176 TFLOPS
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	80+25%
L1 Cache	2 MB+545%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce MX570	FirePro D300
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro D300) — the GeForce MX570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX570	FirePro D300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the FirePro D300's 150W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (FirePro D300). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX570	FirePro D300
TDP	25W-83%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	242mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	229.5+502%	38.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX570 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the FirePro D300 launched at $500 and now averages $20. The FirePro D300 costs 83.3% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.8 (GeForce MX570) vs 286.1 (FirePro D300) — the FirePro D300 offers 498.5% better value. The GeForce MX570 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).