
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 130W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅80.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 24.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌420% higher power demand at 130W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570
2022GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 130W, a 105W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅80.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 24.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌420% higher power demand at 130W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce MX570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce MX570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 107.2%. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 64 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,738 | 11,892+107% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+90% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1755 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 2.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 20+25% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 80+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX570 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX570 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 133.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 224 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 135.5% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-81% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 229.5+151% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 launched at $150 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce MX570 costs 39.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.3 (GeForce MX570) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 24.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-40% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.3 | 47.8+25% |
| Codename | GA107 | GA106 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #407 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













