
GeForce PCX 5300 vs GeForce FX 5500

GeForce PCX 5300
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce PCX 5300 is positioned at rank 376 and the GeForce FX 5500 is on rank 736, so the GeForce PCX 5300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5300
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce PCX 5300.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce PCX 5300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $30 for the GeForce FX 5500, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 50% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+50%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce PCX 5300 and GeForce FX 5500

GeForce PCX 5300
The GeForce PCX 5300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce FX 5500
The GeForce FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce PCX 5300 scores 6 versus the GeForce FX 5500's 8 — the GeForce FX 5500 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce PCX 5300 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce FX 5500 uses Rankine, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5500). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5500). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1320 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 8+33% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+2025% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+3777% | 2.703 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+82% | 1320 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+1000% | 16 |
| TMUs | 680+2025% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+965% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce PCX 5300 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5500 has 256 MB. The GeForce FX 5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 2 MB (GeForce FX 5500) — the GeForce PCX 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5500). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0a |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce PCX 5300) vs No (GeForce FX 5500). Decoder: None vs No.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | No |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5300 draws 575W versus the GeForce FX 5500's 25W — a 183.3% difference. The GeForce FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5500). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 171mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 25W-96% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 171mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce PCX 5300 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce FX 5500 launched at $37 and now averages $30. The GeForce PCX 5300 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.4 (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 0.3 (GeForce FX 5500) — the GeForce PCX 5300 offers 33.3% better value. The GeForce PCX 5300 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $37-38% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-50% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4+33% | 0.3 |
| Codename | GB202 | TU117S |
| Release | January 30 2025 | December 17 2021 |
| Ranking | #3 | #468 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











