GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2050
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2050
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 83% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2050.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-83%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+83%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $150 for the GeForce RTX 2050, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 128.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+128.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 and GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 83%. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 368 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,714 | 14,114+83% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+53% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS+56% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+2% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+53% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+53% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+53% | 30 |
| Tensor Cores | 368+53% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 336 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 29.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 160W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.9 | 88.2+146% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2050 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 20% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 128.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-57% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $120-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.4 | 117.6+129% |
| Codename | TU104 | TU106 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #94 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2050 and GeForce RTX 2060
