
GeForce RTX 2050

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 2060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 2060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2050
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅53.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (368 vs 240).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌34.4% higher power demand at 215W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅17.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 215W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 368), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌132.7% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 51.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 83%. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 368 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,714 | 14,114+83% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+53% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS+56% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+2% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+53% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+53% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+53% | 30 |
| Tensor Cores | 368+53% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 336 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 29.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 160W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.9 | 88.2+146% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2050 came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2050 was 57% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2050 offers 27.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-57% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.4+27% | 40.4 |
| Codename | TU104 | TU106 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #94 | #168 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














