GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 2050
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2050
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 54.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2050.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-54.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+54.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 54.2% better value per dollar than the GeForce RTX 2050.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 54.2%. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 368 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,714 | 11,892+54% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+15% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS+12% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1755 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+130% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+16% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+130% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 368+360% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 224 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 49.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 130W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 235mm |
| Height | 0mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.9 | 91.5+155% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2050 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 54.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-40% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.4 | 79.3+54% |
| Codename | TU104 | GA106 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #94 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2050 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
