
GeForce RTX 2050

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2050
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅170.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (368 vs 136).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 51.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅82.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 10.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 51.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 368), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 193.6%. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 368 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,714 | 22,651+194% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 4352+48% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+119% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2535 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+35% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB | 4.3 MB+48% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+35% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 368+171% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 2050 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2050 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 157.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 288 GB/s+157% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 29.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 160W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.9 | 141.6+294% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2050 came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2050 was 62.4% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 10.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-62% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.4 | 56.8+11% |
| Codename | TU104 | AD106 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #94 | #59 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














