
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 176), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅39.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅120% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (176 vs 80).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅39.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅120% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (176 vs 80).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 176), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 793 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 634 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 198 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 72 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 5632 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 44 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,621 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile's 17,621 — the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile leads by 48.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5,632 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 15.88 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1410 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 44 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) with 80 Tensor cores vs 176.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 17,621+48% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5632+120% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 15.88 TFLOPS+77% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+24% | 1410 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 80 | 176+120% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 5.5 MB+120% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 44+120% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 176+120% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile's 140W — a 7.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 235mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-7% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 235mm | 0mm |
| Height | 124mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 125.9+38% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













