
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 224.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 450W, a 320W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 336mm, a 101mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅125.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅320% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 80).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 450W vs 130W.
- ❌43% longer card at 336mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 224.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 450W, a 320W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 336mm, a 101mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅125.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅320% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 80).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 450W vs 130W.
- ❌43% longer card at 336mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3090 Ti better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 98 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 745 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 608 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 317 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 929 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 586 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 589 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 878 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 710 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 647 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 640 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 417 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 331 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's 29,395 — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti leads by 147.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1860 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 84 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) with 80 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 29,395+147% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 10752+320% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 40 TFLOPS+345% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 1860 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 80 | 336+320% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 10.5 MB+320% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 84+320% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 336+320% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — a 350% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+350% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's 450W — a 110.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 336mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-71% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-47% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 336mm |
| Height | 124mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+40% | 65.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 87.5% less ($1750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 225.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-88% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+225% | 14.7 |
| Codename | GA106 | GA102 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 27 2022 |
| Ranking | #224 | #19 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













