
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 285W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 310mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅123.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌220.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌119.2% higher power demand at 285W vs 130W.
- ❌31.9% longer card at 310mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 285W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 310mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅123.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌220.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌119.2% higher power demand at 285W vs 130W.
- ❌31.9% longer card at 310mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 163 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 752 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 749 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 674 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 609 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,828 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 167.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 66 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) with 80 Tensor cores vs 264.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 31,828+168% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 8448+230% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS+391% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2610 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 264+230% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 8.3 MB+232% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 66+230% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 264+230% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 672 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285W — a 74.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 235mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-54% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-40% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 235mm | 310mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 111.7+22% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 68.8% less ($550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 20.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-69% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+20% | 39.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD103 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #224 | #10 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













