
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

GRID K2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+334.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,950 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8971.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID K2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,737 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1988% HIGHER MSRP$5,199 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022GRID K2
2013Why buy it
- ✅+334.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,950 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8971.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,737 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1988% HIGHER MSRP$5,199 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GRID K2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID K2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and GRID K2

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

GRID K2
GRID K2
The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the GRID K2's 2,737 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 334.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the GRID K2 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,536 (GRID K2). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+334% | 2,737 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+67% | 1536 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+293% | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128 ×2+60% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+1823% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K2 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K2) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the GRID K2's 225W — a 53.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (GRID K2). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-42% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | — |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+650% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the GRID K2 launched at $5199. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 95.2% less ($4950 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 0.5 (GRID K2) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 9460% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-95% | $5199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+9460% | 0.5 |
| Codename | GA106 | GK104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | May 11 2013 |
| Ranking | #224 | #611 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













