
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

L4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+17.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,096 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1003.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌80.6% higher power demand at 130W vs 72W.
- ❌39.1% longer card at 235mm vs 169mm.
L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 72W instead of 130W, a 58W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 235mm, a 66mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,153 vs 11,892).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌841.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,345 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,345 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅+17.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,096 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1003.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 72W instead of 130W, a 58W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 235mm, a 66mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌80.6% higher power demand at 130W vs 72W.
- ❌39.1% longer card at 235mm vs 169mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,153 vs 11,892).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌841.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,345 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,345 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than L4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does L4 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 93 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and L4

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

L4
L4
The L4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 72W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the L4's 10,153 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 17.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the L4 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7,424 (L4). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 30.29 TFLOPS (L4). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2040 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 60 (L4) with 80 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+17% | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 7424+190% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 30.29 TFLOPS+237% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2040 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 7.5 MB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 60+200% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 240+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (L4) — the L4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (L4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (L4). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC (4x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (L4).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC (4x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the L4's 72W — a 57.4% difference. The L4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (L4). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 169mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 72W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 169mm |
| Height | 124mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 141.0+54% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the L4 launched at $2345. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 89.4% less ($2096 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4.3 (L4) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1011.6% better value. The L4 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-89% | $2345 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+1012% | 4.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #259 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













