G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1953.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅14.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1907.6% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1953.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.

Why buy it

✅14.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1907.6% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Quadro M6000 24GB?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro M6000 24GB averages 14.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,892 vs 11,625 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Quadro M6000 24GB is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 8nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is about $4,750 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $4,999 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1953.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro M6000 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro M6000 24GB is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $4,999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Quadro M6000 24GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	130 FPS	160 FPS
medium	113 FPS	142 FPS
high	99 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	140 FPS
medium	96 FPS	120 FPS
high	81 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	61 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	67 FPS
medium	57 FPS	58 FPS
high	39 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	35 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	239 FPS	191 FPS
medium	206 FPS	168 FPS
high	164 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	131 FPS
medium	135 FPS	106 FPS
high	112 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	63 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	62 FPS
medium	74 FPS	52 FPS
high	62 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	535 FPS	523 FPS
medium	428 FPS	418 FPS
high	357 FPS	349 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	392 FPS
medium	321 FPS	314 FPS
high	268 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	196 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	262 FPS
medium	214 FPS	209 FPS
high	178 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	131 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Quadro M6000 24GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	467 FPS	233 FPS
medium	414 FPS	200 FPS
high	335 FPS	166 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	179 FPS
medium	321 FPS	157 FPS
high	236 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	102 FPS
medium	175 FPS	82 FPS
high	150 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Quadro M6000 24GB

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Quadro M6000 24GB reaches 11,625 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000 24GB
G3D Mark Score	11,892+2%	11,625
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560	3072+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS+31%	6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+58%	1114 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+127%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000 24GB
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 41.5% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000 24GB
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	24 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	317 GB/s+42%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000 24GB
DirectX	12.2+2%	12/1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000 24GB
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000 24GB
TDP	130W-48%	250W
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	235mm	267mm
Height	124mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	91.5+97%	46.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 95% less ($4750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1978.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).