
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅47.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Quadro P4000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅47.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Quadro P4000 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P4000 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 84 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Quadro P4000 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1114 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Quadro P4000 Max-Q's 7,500 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 58.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Quadro P4000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4.401 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1228 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+59% | 7,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+104% | 4.401 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+43% | 1228 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+279% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Quadro P4000 Max-Q's 100W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 100W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 0mm |
| Height | 124mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+22% | 75.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | GP104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #224 | #298 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













