
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon 680M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+210% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
- ❌23400% longer card at 235mm vs 1mm.
Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 235mm, a 234mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,836 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅+210% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 235mm, a 234mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
- ❌23400% longer card at 235mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,836 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon 680M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 680M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 22 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 43 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon 680M

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon 680M's 3,836 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 210%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 (Radeon 680M) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+210% | 3,836 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+233% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+166% | 3.379 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2200 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+900% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+67% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 680M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.1 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 50W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 1mm |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+19% | 76.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 680M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | Rembrandt+ |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #512 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













