
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅105.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌52.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 130W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌20.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅105.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 130W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌52.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌20.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon Pro 5300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Pro 5300

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 7,125 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 66.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+67% | 7,125 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+100% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+113% | 4.224 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+6% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5300 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 85W — a 41.9% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 85W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 0mm |
| Height | 124mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+9% | 83.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5300 launched at $300. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 17% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 23.8 (Radeon Pro 5300) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+101% | 23.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #224 | #351 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













