
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+27.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 11,892).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+27.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 11,892).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon Pro 5600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 105 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Pro 5600M

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 9,324 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 27.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+28% | 9,324 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+70% | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+70% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the Radeon Pro 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 50W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 0mm |
| Height | 124mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 186.5+104% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 12 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | June 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #224 | #283 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













