
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅13.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 232.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌220.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅13.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 232.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌220.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon Pro 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 83 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Pro 5700

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+4% | 11,469 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+44% | 6.221 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+30% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 144+80% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+4% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 68.8% less ($550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 231.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-69% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+232% | 14.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #224 | #238 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













