
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100.8% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100.8% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5700 XT better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 64 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 140 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 12,442+5% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+17% | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+17% | 1499 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | — |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 95.7+5% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 50.2% less ($251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 92% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-50% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+92% | 24.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #224 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













