
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1398.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega II Duo across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
2019Why buy it
- ✅7.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1666.7% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1398.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅7.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega II Duo across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1666.7% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Vega II Duo better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega II Duo?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 136 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 110 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,018 points. Launch price was $4,399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo's 14,018 — the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo leads by 17.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo uses GCN 5.1, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 14,018+18% |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096 ×2+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS ×2+57% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+2% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256 ×2+220% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+150% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — a 285.7% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 864 GB/s+286% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 8.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 8+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 4.1 (2x) (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.2 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.1 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.2 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo's 475W — a 114% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-73% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+210% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo launched at $4399. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 94.3% less ($4150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3.2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1393.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-94% | $4399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+1394% | 3.2 |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 20 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #224 | #170 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













