G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 429.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO W6800

2021

Why buy it

✅83.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
803.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,249 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Radeon PRO W6800

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 429.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅83.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
803.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,249 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W6800 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6800 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 83.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 70.5% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 32 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2021 instead of 2022, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6800 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 70.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 32 GB instead of 8 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 7nm process instead of 8nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W6800 is about 803.2% more expensive on MSRP at $2,249 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 83.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 70.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W6800 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Radeon PRO W6800?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 250W), and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W6800. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W6800 currently gives you 70.5% higher G3D Mark and 83.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6800 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	130 FPS	222 FPS
medium	113 FPS	204 FPS
high	99 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	200 FPS
medium	96 FPS	167 FPS
high	81 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	129 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	135 FPS
medium	57 FPS	114 FPS
high	39 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	83 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon PRO W6800

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	239 FPS	549 FPS
medium	206 FPS	468 FPS
high	164 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	372 FPS
medium	135 FPS	308 FPS
high	112 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	202 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	156 FPS
medium	74 FPS	134 FPS
high	62 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	90 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon PRO W6800

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	535 FPS	912 FPS
medium	428 FPS	730 FPS
high	357 FPS	608 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	456 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	684 FPS
medium	321 FPS	547 FPS
high	268 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	456 FPS
medium	214 FPS	365 FPS
high	178 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	228 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon PRO W6800

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	467 FPS	687 FPS
medium	414 FPS	558 FPS
high	335 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	449 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	574 FPS
medium	321 FPS	472 FPS
high	236 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	367 FPS
medium	175 FPS	316 FPS
high	150 FPS	292 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	228 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon PRO W6800

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon PRO W6800

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon PRO W6800

The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 20,270 — the Radeon PRO W6800 leads by 70.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 80 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO W6800
G3D Mark Score	11,892	20,270+70%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560	3840+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	17.82 TFLOPS+98%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz	2320 MHz+32%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	80	240+200%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+233%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	20	60+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO W6800
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 157.1% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the Radeon PRO W6800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO W6800
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	576 GB/s+157%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO W6800
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO W6800
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO W6800
TDP	130W-48%	250W
Recommended PSU	450W-31%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	235mm	267mm
Height	124mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	91.5+13%	81.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 88.9% less ($2000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 431.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).