
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅77.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 58.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.2 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅77.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 58.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.2 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon R9 380?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon R9 380

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon R9 380's 6,000 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 98.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+98% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+159% | 3.476 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+81% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+468% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 380 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 182.4 GB/s (Radeon R9 380) — a 22.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+23% | 182.4 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | — |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | — |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 51.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-41% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 235mm | — |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+235% | 27.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380 launched at $199. The Radeon R9 380 costs 20.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 30.2 (Radeon R9 380) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 58.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $199-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+58% | 30.2 |
| Codename | GA106 | Antigua |
| Release | January 4 2022 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #224 | #396 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













