
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅95.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌39.1% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 130W vs 110W.
- ❌30.6% longer card at 235mm vs 180mm.
Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 130W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 180mm instead of 235mm, a 55mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅95.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 130W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 180mm instead of 235mm, a 55mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌39.1% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 130W vs 110W.
- ❌30.6% longer card at 235mm vs 180mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon RX 5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 5500

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 5500's 8,837 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 34.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+35% | 8,837 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+82% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+73% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 1845 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 88+10% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 16.7% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 110W-15% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 450W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 180mm |
| Height | 124mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+14% | 80.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 28.1% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 3.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $179-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8 | 49.4+3% |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #224 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













