
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+99.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌52.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 85W.
Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 130W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,954 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅+99.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 130W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌52.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,954 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon RX 5500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5500M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 67 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 5500M

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 5,954 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 99.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+100% | 5,954 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+82% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+94% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+7% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 88+10% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 41.9% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 85W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 0mm |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+31% | 70.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #224 | #400 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













