
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅64.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅64.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon RX 6500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6500M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 6500M

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 7,443 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 59.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6500M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 16 (Radeon RX 6500M) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+60% | 7,443 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+83% | 4.915 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2400 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+900% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500M) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+56% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6500M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 50W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 235mm | — |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 148.9+63% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













