GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Radeon RX 6700 XT

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1755 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6700 XT

2021Core: 2321 MHzBoost: 2581 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $230 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
  • Delivers 15.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Draws 130W instead of 230W, a 100W reduction.
  • Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6700 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon RX 6700 XT

2021

Why buy it

  • 49.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
  • 92.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $479 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.2 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 76.9% higher power demand at 230W vs 130W.
  • 13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6700 XT better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Yes. Radeon RX 6700 XT is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 49.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 66.1% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2021 instead of 2022, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6700 XT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 66.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 8 GB, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 7nm process instead of 8nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX 6700 XT is about 92.4% more expensive on MSRP at $479 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 49.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 66.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 6700 XT is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Radeon RX 6700 XT?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 230W), and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 6700 XT. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 6700 XT currently gives you 66.1% higher G3D Mark and 49.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRadeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low130 FPS179 FPS
medium113 FPS159 FPS
high99 FPS145 FPS
ultra83 FPS122 FPS
1440p
low119 FPS145 FPS
medium96 FPS117 FPS
high81 FPS108 FPS
ultra69 FPS97 FPS
4K
low64 FPS87 FPS
medium57 FPS73 FPS
high39 FPS60 FPS
ultra33 FPS52 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRadeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low239 FPS479 FPS
medium206 FPS405 FPS
high164 FPS326 FPS
ultra128 FPS274 FPS
1440p
low163 FPS298 FPS
medium135 FPS246 FPS
high112 FPS206 FPS
ultra92 FPS173 FPS
4K
low88 FPS131 FPS
medium74 FPS112 FPS
high62 FPS91 FPS
ultra49 FPS70 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRadeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low535 FPS867 FPS
medium428 FPS705 FPS
high357 FPS593 FPS
ultra268 FPS444 FPS
1440p
low401 FPS663 FPS
medium321 FPS532 FPS
high268 FPS444 FPS
ultra201 FPS333 FPS
4K
low268 FPS444 FPS
medium214 FPS356 FPS
high178 FPS296 FPS
ultra134 FPS222 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRadeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low467 FPS703 FPS
medium414 FPS585 FPS
high335 FPS491 FPS
ultra268 FPS412 FPS
1440p
low372 FPS541 FPS
medium321 FPS451 FPS
high236 FPS367 FPS
ultra197 FPS308 FPS
4K
low199 FPS322 FPS
medium175 FPS285 FPS
high150 FPS257 FPS
ultra125 FPS210 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 6700 XT

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 6700 XT

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,754 points. Launch price was $479.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 19,754 — the Radeon RX 6700 XT leads by 66.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6700 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) with 80 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRadeon RX 6700 XT
G3D Mark Score
11,892
19,754+66%
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
2560
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS
13.21 TFLOPS+47%
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
2581 MHz+47%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
160+100%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB+400%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores
20
40+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRadeon RX 6700 XT
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 6700 XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — a 71.4% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 XT. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the Radeon RX 6700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRadeon RX 6700 XT
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
12 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
384 GB/s+71%
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRadeon RX 6700 XT
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700 XT).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRadeon RX 6700 XT
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCE
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 230W — a 55.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRadeon RX 6700 XT
TDP
130W-43%
230W
Recommended PSU
450W-31%
650W
Power Connector
8-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
235mm
267mm
Height
124mm
110mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
91.5+7%
85.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT launched at $479. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 48% less ($230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 16% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRadeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP
$249-48%
$479
Performance per Dollar
47.8+16%
41.2
Codename
GA106
Navi 22
Release
January 4 2022
March 3 2021
Ranking
#224
#80