G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 78.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6900 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6900 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon RX 6900 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅87.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌
301.2% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Radeon RX 6900 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 78.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅87.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6900 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6900 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌
301.2% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6900 XT better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes. Radeon RX 6900 XT is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 6900 XT averages 87.7% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 26,729 vs 11,892 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6900 XT is a 2020 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6900 XT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 124.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 8 GB, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 7nm process instead of 8nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6900 XT is about 301.2% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 87.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 124.8% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 6900 XT is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Radeon RX 6900 XT?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 300W), and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 6900 XT. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 6900 XT currently gives you 124.8% higher G3D Mark and 87.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6900 XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6900 XT
1080p
low	130 FPS	258 FPS
medium	113 FPS	235 FPS
high	99 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	242 FPS
medium	96 FPS	200 FPS
high	81 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	171 FPS
medium	57 FPS	143 FPS
high	39 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	95 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 6900 XT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6900 XT
1080p
low	239 FPS	601 FPS
medium	206 FPS	500 FPS
high	164 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	341 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	397 FPS
medium	135 FPS	330 FPS
high	112 FPS	271 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	221 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	193 FPS
medium	74 FPS	162 FPS
high	62 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	111 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 6900 XT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6900 XT
1080p
low	535 FPS	924 FPS
medium	428 FPS	767 FPS
high	357 FPS	683 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	585 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	714 FPS
medium	321 FPS	587 FPS
high	268 FPS	510 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	498 FPS
medium	214 FPS	412 FPS
high	178 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	290 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 6900 XT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6900 XT
1080p
low	467 FPS	684 FPS
medium	414 FPS	565 FPS
high	335 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	446 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	563 FPS
medium	321 FPS	471 FPS
high	236 FPS	408 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	360 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	365 FPS
medium	175 FPS	317 FPS
high	150 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	256 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 6900 XT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 6900 XT

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 6900 XT

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,729 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 26,729 — the Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 124.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6900 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 80 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) with 80 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6900 XT
G3D Mark Score	11,892	26,729+125%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560	5120+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	23.04 TFLOPS+156%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz	2250 MHz+28%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	80	320+300%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+150%	1 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	20	80+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6900 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6900 XT
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6900 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — a 128.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — the Radeon RX 6900 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6900 XT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	512 GB/s+129%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6900 XT
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 6900 XT).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6900 XT
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 300W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 850W (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2.5 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6900 XT
TDP	130W-57%	300W
Recommended PSU	450W-47%	850W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	235mm	267mm
Height	124mm	120mm
Slots	2-20%	2.5
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	91.5+3%	89.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 75.1% less ($750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 26.8 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 78.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).