
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅28.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 240mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 20,024).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 57.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅+68.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 20.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 57.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅28.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 240mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+68.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 20.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 57.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 20,024).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 57.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 404 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 229 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 117 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 49 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the RDNA 4 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2530 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,024 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB's 20,024 — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB leads by 68.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB uses RDNA 4, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2530 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 20,024+68% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 4 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2530 MHz+44% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB) — a 42.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 320 GB/s+43% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 550W (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 75W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-18% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 240mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 267.0+192% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB launched at $349. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 28.7% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 57.4 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB) — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB offers 20.1% better value. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-29% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8 | 57.4+20% |
| Codename | GA106 | — |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 2 2025 |
| Ranking | #224 | #45 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













