G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅+67.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 11,892).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅+67.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 11,892).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than RadeonT 780M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 67.5% higher PassMark G3D performance, DLSS 2 Super Resolution, and 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2022 instead of 2024, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 780M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 4nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $249 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 67.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RadeonT 780M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 130W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RadeonT 780M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes. RadeonT 780M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 130W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3050 OEM currently gives you 67.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

RadeonT 780M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	130 FPS	93 FPS
medium	113 FPS	78 FPS
high	99 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	80 FPS
medium	96 FPS	68 FPS
high	81 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	29 FPS
medium	57 FPS	27 FPS
high	39 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RadeonT 780M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	239 FPS	98 FPS
medium	206 FPS	68 FPS
high	164 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	33 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	67 FPS
medium	135 FPS	45 FPS
high	112 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	24 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	35 FPS
medium	74 FPS	25 FPS
high	62 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RadeonT 780M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	535 FPS	319 FPS
medium	428 FPS	256 FPS
high	357 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	160 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	240 FPS
medium	321 FPS	192 FPS
high	268 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	159 FPS
medium	214 FPS	128 FPS
high	178 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	77 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RadeonT 780M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	467 FPS	214 FPS
medium	414 FPS	171 FPS
high	335 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	142 FPS
medium	321 FPS	117 FPS
high	236 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	83 FPS
medium	175 FPS	67 FPS
high	150 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RadeonT 780M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RadeonT 780M

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RadeonT 780M's 7,098 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 67.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 (RadeonT 780M) with 80 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score	11,892+68%	7,098
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	2560+233%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	8.909 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1755 MHz	2900 MHz+65%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+67%	48
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+900%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	20+67%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT 780M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 780M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT 780M
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT 780M
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 158.6% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 235mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.