
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 16 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅39.8% more average FPS across 16 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 80).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅39.8% more average FPS across 16 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 80).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 16 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 212 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,656 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 19,656 — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU leads by 65.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 80 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 19,656+65% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5120+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 15.82 TFLOPS+76% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+14% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 5 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 40+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 160+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 92.9% advantage for the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 432 GB/s+93% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 100W — a 26.1% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 150W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 100W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 150W-67% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 235mm | — |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 196.6+115% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | AD104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #81 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













